Blog — Galanda Broadman

Believe It: Indigenous Americans Shifted Rightward, Voted Trump

On November 5th, typically Democratic-voting Indigenous people joined those who rejected the liberal worldview of Washington, DC elites. They voted for Donald Trump in significant numbers even though his administration poses an existential threat to Tribal nations.

There were early signs of this rightward shift.

As an August New York Times story explained: “Despite President Biden naming the first Indigenous cabinet secretary, some Indigenous voters said they still felt voiceless in Washington, and ignored by a federal government that they say has inflicted centuries of harm.”

That Indigenous people would express even muted criticism about Deb Haaland, this country’s first Indigenous cabinet Secretary, proved foretelling.

By the end of October, “dozens” of Indigenous people “who spoke to the AP in the final weeks before the election expressed frustration with Democratic-leaning tribal governments…and politicians in Washington, who they say rarely use their seat at the table to push for them.”

As the dust now settles on the election, the New York Times reports “there were shifts to the right in counties with large populations of…Native American residents.” That is consistent with what is being reported from reliably blue greater Seattle-King County:

In King County, the place that moved the most toward Trump compared to 2020 is on the plateau just east of Auburn, in and around the Muckleshoot tribal lands. The core precinct where Muckleshoot tribal headquarters is located shifted nearly 15 points to Trump….

In a post-election briefing, analysts for AAPI Data, a group that monitors Asian American and Pacific Islander trends, said both Asian and Native American voting margins for Democrats have been dropping.

Likewise, Politico reports:

In Montana, the four counties that reported the sharpest shifts to the right had Native American majorities. In South Dakota, all nine counties with Native American majorities shifted rightward. The same trend held true in neighboring North Dakota, where Sioux County — which is 81 percent Native American — showed the biggest rightward shift of any of the state’s 53 counties, at 10 points.

Elsewhere — in states with large or small Native American populations — the story was much the same. New Mexico’s McKinley County, which is 81 percent Native American and home to members of several different tribes, shifted 14 points to the right. Minnesota’s Mahnomen County, which is 43 percent Native American, moved 7 points — the biggest shift of any county in the state.

As Politico explains, “public safety and economic concerns appear to have rated high among many of those [Trump] voters,” especially as “inflation imposed severe hardships on many Native American families.”

These assessments are corroborated by a poll of 865 Indigenous people conducted by Native News Online in collaboration with Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism and Qualtrics.

According to that survey: “Donald Trump received 51% of Native American votes in the presidential election, while Kamala Harris garnered 45% of the votes,” with Indigenous Trump voters citing “inflation (21%), immigration (16%) and jobs/economy (14%) as their primary concerns.”

Only time will tell if these election results signal a rise in Indigenous populism.

It is worrisome that so many Indigenous voters would support a presidential candidate whose party threatens economic, environmental, and cultural harm to Tribal nations. By voting for Trump, those voters may end up in a worse condition by way of their Tribal nations, which will almost certainly face slashed federal program dollars and aggressive mineral extraction from sacred ancestral homelands.

It is also worrisome that the Democratic-Indigenous political media apparatus remains in denial that Donald Trump won Indigenous America in 2024. If influential folks don’t get right, and course correct, it will be Tribal nations who suffer the existential consequences.

Gabe Galanda is an Indigenous rights attorney and the managing lawyer at Galanda Broadman. He has been named to Best Lawyers in America in the fields of Native American Law and Gaming Law from 2007 to 2024, and dubbed a Super Lawyer by his peers from 2013 to 2024.

Indigenous Populism Confronts Federal Indian Elitism

Last Tuesday, the American people roundly rejected federal political elitism. It appears typically Democratic-voting Indigenous people joined those who rejected the liberal worldview of Washington, DC elites.

There were early signs of the Indigenous populism reflected at the polls.

As an August New York Times story explained: “Despite President Biden naming the first Indigenous cabinet secretary, some Indigenous voters said they still felt voiceless in Washington, and ignored by a federal government that they say has inflicted centuries of harm.”

An NPR story, also in August, chronicled Indigenous people’s concerns about Interior Secretary Deb Haaland’s failure to block and tackle on behalf of missing and murdered Indigenous women. “A lot of people are hesitant to criticize her,” NPR explained, but many “say their confidence in her ability to champion Indigenous needs is slipping.”

By the end of October, “dozens” of Indigenous people “who spoke to the AP in the final weeks before the election expressed frustration with Democratic-leaning tribal governments…and politicians in Washington, who they say rarely use their seat at the table to push for them.”

As the dust now settles on the election, the New York Times reports “there were shifts to the right in counties with large populations of…Native American residents.” That is consistent with what is being reported from reliably blue greater Seattle:

In King County, the place that moved the most toward Trump compared to 2020 is on the plateau just east of Auburn, in and around the Muckleshoot tribal lands. The core precinct where Muckleshoot tribal headquarters is located shifted nearly 15 points to Trump….

In a post-election briefing, analysts for AAPI Data, a group that monitors Asian American and Pacific Islander trends, said both Asian and Native American voting margins for Democrats have been dropping.

The through-line of these mainstream election news stories is that ordinary Indigenous people’s needs and fears were not heard by the Biden Democrats and are generally not being heard by DC political elites.

That Indigenous people would express even muted criticism about this country’s first Indigenous cabinet Secretary suggests populism is rising in Indian country.

In my own observation, DC political elites—including so-called DC Indians—increasingly ignore the fundamental rights and basic needs of ordinary Indigenous people.

When’s the last time an everyday Indigenous person testified before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs about an existential individual concern? When’s the last time an Interior Secretary took a meeting with a Tribal human rights victim? 

Ordinary Indigenous people who don’t wield Indian gaming money, or who express Tribal human rights concerns, are denied access to federal law and policy makers.

They don’t get meetings with U.S. officials, no matter who’s in the White House. They aren’t allowed to testify before Congress, no matter which party is in the majority.  They don’t get audiences with DC political elites.

Why? Because there is simply no political or financial incentive to allow ordinary Indigenous people access to the federal political establishment.

There is, however, enormous incentive to allow Tribal gaming politicians and gaming-allied “Tribal sovereignty” advocates federal access. The $42 billion Indian gaming industry is highly incentivizing to folks serving in presidential administrations and on Capitol Hill.

Ordinary Indigenous people simply don’t have the cash needed to compete for federal political attention.

But what ordinary Indigenous people can compete with is their votes, especially in swing states amid an increasingly divided nation.  If DC elites don’t contend with rising Indigenous populism, it may cost them future control of the country—if not their careers.

Gabe Galanda is an Indigenous rights attorney and the managing lawyer at Galanda Broadman. He has been named to Best Lawyers in America in the fields of Native American Law and Gaming Law from 2007 to 2024, and dubbed a Super Lawyer by his peers from 2013 to 2024.

Anthony Broadman Elected to Oregon State Senate

On Tuesday, central Oregon voters elected Anthony Broadman to the Oregon State Senate by an overwhelming margin. 

Anthony is a Galanda Broadman founder and partner, Bend City Councilor, Warm Springs appellate court judge, and legal counsel to Tribal nations throughout the west.

He will continue with Galanda Broadman out of Bend while serving in the Oregon State Senate.

Congratulations, Senator Broadman!

Galanda Broadman Named "Best Firm" in Native American & Gaming Law for Thirteenth Year

Galanda Broadman, PLLC, has been named a “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News - Best Lawyers in the arena of Native American Law and Gaming Law, for the thirteenth year in a row. 

According to U.S. News - Best Lawyers, the firm's national ranking was determined through the firm's overall evaluation, which was derived from a combination of Galanda Broadman’s “clients' impressive feedback” and “the high regard that lawyers in other firms in the same practice area have for [the] firm.” 

Galanda Broadman is dedicated to advancing Tribal legal rights and business interests and defending Indigenous human rights.

The firm, with eight lawyers and offices in Seattle and Yakima, Washington and Bend, Oregon, represents Tribal governments, businesses, and citizens and Indigenous people in critical litigation, business and regulatory matters—especially in matters of Treaty rights, sovereignty, taxation, civil rights, and belonging.