Blog — Galanda Broadman

Gabe Galanda Returns Home to Clallam County to Discuss Indian Civil Rights Advocacy

Clallam_County_Courthouse_09-11-13_Wiki.jpg

On Friday, November 3rd, Gabe Galanda will address the Clallam-Jefferson County Pro Bono Lawyers, regarding "American Indian Civil Rights Advocacy."

Gabe will speak at the group's CLE Bonanza at the Sequim Transit Center.  He will be joined by Assistant U.S. Attorney Tate London, who will address “Federal Prosecutions in Indian Country.”

Gabriel S. Galanda is the managing lawyer of Galanda Broadman, PLLC, in Seattle. Gabe is a descendant of the Nomlaki and Concow Tribes, belonging to the Round Valley Indian Tribes of Northern California.  He was born in Port Angeles, Washington and raised in Clallam County, between P.A. and Carlsborg, a hamlet just outside of Sequim.

Gabe Galanda to Talk Tribal Kinship Versus Disnrollment at UNM Gallup

snapshot-.jpg

Gabe Galanda will deliver a lecture on tribal kinship and disenrollment to UNM Gallup classes on Thursday, October 26, 2017. 

His talk will be inspired by the lecture he delivered last week at Western Washington University titled "Restoring Indigenous Kinship Amidst America's Nationalist Movement."

Gabriel S. Galanda is the managing lawyer of Galanda Broadman, PLLC, in Seattle. Gabe is a descendant of the Nomlaki and Concow Tribes, belonging to the Round Valley Indian Tribes of Northern California.  

Silence-Breaker: California Indian Law Association Speaks On Disenrollment

The California Indian Law Association is featuring the following program in Sacramento on Friday, October 14:

1:15 – 2:30 pm Tribal Disenrollment and Exclusions: A Discussion of Tribal Interests
 Moderator: Christina Snider, CILA Vice President
Panelists:
                 [INVITED]Adam Bailey, Associate, Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker
                 Sara Dutschke Setshwaelo, Counsel, Dentons LLP
                 Frank Lawrence, Law Office of Frank Lawrence
                 EJ “Eddie” Crandell, Chairperson, Robinson Rancheria

Each of these speakers, and the CILA conference organizers, should be commended for their bravery for discussing the still relatively taboo issue of disenrollment.

California remains the epicenter of disenrollment, with more than 30 tribes or rancherias having engaged in the practice according to Professor David Wilkins.  That's nearly half of all tribes in the country who have disenrolled their relatives.  At the Elem Colony, for example, the entire on-colony population were proposed for disenrollment in 2016 and are now being disenfranchised.

Ramona Band of Cahuilla Chairman Joseph Hamilton aptly described things in the Golden State:

In Southern California, where my tribe calls home, disenrollment is common, in part because of big gaming revenues and internal power struggles. It is also a symptom of the breakdown of traditional tribal power structures. Simply put, some tribal leaders listen to lawyers instead of elders.

Meanwhile over the last couple decades, the typically thought-leading UC System has turned a deaf ear to disenrollment.

[T]hose issues remain taboo within the Indian Country academic establishment, despite the current Indian disenrollment epidemic and the ability of our brightest minds to identify the causes and develop the cures.

As a Native person rightfully commented on a recent column by Professor David Wilkins: "There are no easy answers but I believe academia deserves as much of the blame as anyone for not facing this reality and attacking it head on."

With disenrollment having run rampant throughout California since the mid-2000s, that blame is rightly owed to lawyers and academics in the UC System, and to attorneys in general, for not doing enough---perhaps no doing anything---to prevent the epidemic from spreading.

In fact, as Professor Wilkins concludes in his seminal book on disenrollment, Dismembered, some lawyers have actually helped spread the epidemic: "there is evidence that some attorneys have prolonged or even fomented conflict to gain more resources for themselves and their law firms."

But with every dialogue about the subject---whether a speaker believes disenrollment is the prerogative of tribal politicians, or is antithetical to tribalism---there is hope.  Silence in too many realms has greatly contributed to the epidemic.  Public discourse will help cure it.

Gabriel S. Galanda is the managing lawyer of Galanda Broadman, PLLC, in Seattle. Gabe is a descendant of the Nomlaki and Concow Tribes, belonging to the Round Valley Indian Tribes of Northern California.  

 

 

Bree Black Horse Heads to Kansas Law to Talk Indian Civil Rights, Disenrollment

DSC_8834.jpg

At the invitation of Associate Dean Elizabeth Kronk, Bree Black Horse will visit the University of Kansas School of Law on Thursday, October 12, 2017, to speak to law students regarding "Indian Law and Tribal Disenrollments."  

Bree will discuss career opportunities in Indian law, and her work with the firm in Indian civil rights advocacy, particularly in the disenrollment context.  Gabe Galanda will join her for the presentation via Skype.

Bree Black Horse is an Associate in the Seattle office.  Bree's practice focuses on federal court and tribal court litigation involving tribal governments, enterprises and members.  She can be reached at (206) 735-0448 or bree@galandabroadman.com.

Zinke’s Disloyalty Purge Of Interior Is Un-American

ryanzinke030217.jpg

By Anthony Broadman

Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke said last week in a speech to oil industry representatives that “I got 30 percent of the crew that’s not loyal to the flag.”

He reportedly said Interior is a pirate ship that captures “a prized ship at sea and only the captain and the first mate row over.” 

His message was clear.  For Zinke, federal public service means loyalty to Donald Trump.  That kind of loyalty test and resulting purges of “disloyal” non-political public servants—often called “career staff”—are un-American.

It’s even worse against the backdrop of Zinke’s move-or-quit approach to remaking Interior and the BIA.  This summer, Zinke reassigned around 50 senior executive employees—over one-fifth of all senior executive employees at Interior.  If he didn’t want many of those 50 to quit, reassigning them all at once seems like a weird move.

The employees who are reassigned and targeted for disloyalty will of course personally bear the direct brunt of Zinke’s efforts.  But purge-panic and yet more political intrigue at the BIA won’t serve Tribes and Tribal members. 

Zinke’s reshuffling and termination of Interior employees might violate federal law; it would violate many state laws.  “If the First Amendment protects a public employee from discharge based on what he has said, it must also protect him from discharge based on what he believes.”  Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507, 515 (1980).  But an Inspector General investigation and employment lawsuits will decide that question. 

More importantly for Interior and its Bureau of Indian Affairs, testing political loyalty of employees charged with ministerial execution of federal law smacks of the kind of abusive patronage practices that civil service statutes sought to prevent.

Zinke says he wants “to increase employee morale and ensure those of you on the front lines have the right tools, right resources, and flexibility to make the decisions to allow you to do your job.” Purges of intellectuals and sending disloyal employees ‘down to the countryside’ won’t accomplish this.  Zinke’s latest loyalty comments only make his purge efforts look more like the Cultural Revolution reassigned employees suspect he is carrying out.

Anthony Broadman is a partner at Galanda Broadman PLLC.  He can be reached at 206.321.2672, anthony@galandabroadman.com, or via www.galandabroadman.com.